dcpblog.png

February 2009 Archives

Twitter-addicts

I may be a relative Luddite or perhaps a little antisocial, as I don't even give out my cell phone number much or use the thing other than for very specific purposes! I've been blogging for a long time, but MySpace and Facebook may be about as far as I want to take it and some of that has been experimental! These can be definite black holes of time consumption. MySpace offers infinite ways to personalize the page and Facebook lets people be pirates, throw food and be kids in many respects. Both have potential for political activity, artistic and musical networking and much more. I get invitations to join other social networking sites and now I delete them. I am maxed out. Do we have any idea how much data these people are collecting about us? Doesn't Rupert Murdoch own MySpace? Doesn't he own FOX News? Should we be wondering?

Now it's en vogue to "tweet" on Twitter and I have not figured it out entirely and am questioning whether to. Daniel Schorr (who is in his 90s but still comments at NPR) had kind of laugh at the idea this morning on NPR. "Why do people do it?" has asked, and the interviewer didn't seem to really have an answer! 140 keystrokes - that's how long a message can be! I can see text messaging someone but the whole world? Our "followers"? Or "following" someone? Can someone please explain this to me? I can't stay on top of emails!

I enjoyed reading what Lee Woodruff at Daily Beast had to say about it all:


How far are we from the minutiae of someone’s stomach virus, a lost button on a favorite pair of corduroys or, to steal loosely from the late John Updike, the announcement of a perfectly coiled bowel movement in the bowl after the morning’s first cup of Joe?

I do enjoy the fact that Greg Palast follows one of our blogs, and that I am a Facebook "friend" of people like Ann Magnuson and Max Blumenthal, who I think are intensely cool! It blows me away that these sites have people on them from all over the world! I may be reaching the breaking point though!

More from Lee (Is there a way I can be her "friend?!")

I don’t need to know that someone just visited their office vending machine for Doritos or that they are about to take their Shit-zu for a walk. I don’t want to know that kind of info about my own husband.

Again, who are these people who are Twittering back? If they are employed, shouldn’t they be (particularly in this economy) putting their noses to the grindstone? Shouldn’t they be concerned for their jobs, laboring away at their desks, working the phones, hopping to, rather than twittering away about last night’s bad Chinese food? And what if they aren’t employed? What if they are kicking about at home, maybe a wife or hubby just hanging out while the kids are at school, or someone in transit on a train or bus. Don’t these people have better things to do then telegraph their where-abouts? Isn’t there laundry to throw in, some real news to catch up on online or a good book to read? Books. Remember them? They came off a printing press. What about a little do-gooding in the community, English as a second language to teach, a PTO board to assist. How about, God forbid, an honest good old-fashioned moment of repose and reflection?

I am not embarrassed to post this and be all "uncool" and not Twitter (or is it "Tweet" ON Twitter?) So far I just can't face the fact of having a sea of messages on my cell phone or having to do anything social in real time (other than in person) and I don't have a great attention span in the first place! I can't even send pictures, which makes it a little too "wordy" for me, a little too "left-brained"!


More from Lee:

I’m not gonna go all retro on you here. I know I sound a bit like Archie Bunker. I’ll be the first to admit that instant communication has a premiere place in my universe. My BlackBerry enables me to stay slightly on top of the pile while out of the office. And I’m not saying I’m never, ever going to join Twitter—I learned long ago never to say never. But people—let’s use a little moderation here. Get back to your desks. Go read an article in the New Yorker. You remember those, don’t you? Magazines?

Except magazines are going monthly (US News & World Report), upscale (Newsweek), small (Rolling Stone) and newspapers are going online or extinct (SF Chronicle, Seattle PI, Rocky Mountain News.) Is it because everybody is too busy "communicating?" Actually, I think it's because of a drop in advertising revenue and the fact that everyone is on-line, but don't the social networking sites also expose people to a whole new level of overt and subliminal "targeted" advertising? Wasn't it just last week or so that Facebook's new Terms of Service which allowed them to keep all content indefinitely were challenged by users and had to be altered? We need to examine the social and political implications of every new change in communication technology. On the one hand, we talk about Big Brother, the Patriot Act and privacy - on the other, we like to enjoy being social creatures with a sense of connection in our busy lives. Where is the balance?


In light of the present financial crisis, it's interesting to read what Thomas Jefferson said in 1802:

Banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.

Doesn't this sound eerily familiar to what is happening in America today?

jefferson-banking.jpg

Starhawk Evokes Obama As "Nurturing Father"

Comments (3)

Poster2009conference

Starhawk (ecofeminist and justice worker) had contracted to speak at Women of Wisdom at Unity Church in Seattle, before the election actually happened, so she was ready to be grateful we could meet in an era of HOPE and CHANGE rather than in one where we are figuring out how to go on at all (in case a McCain/Palin victory had happened.) She talked about the "magical aspects" of the election and the emergence of a very different "energy." She compared it to sitting in a room full of toxic chemicals and all of a sudden, someone opens a window. After all, we had a financial crash just before the election, as though global warming and wars were not enough - we needed to be hit in the pocketbook. The universe made it clear to us that we needed change!

It was good to see someone I've been reading off and on for 20 years, and to hear of her permaculture and justice work, which she even manages to combine. For example, imagine coming up with composting toilets and the like for the G7 type protests over in Europe or wherever - then using the same technology to help victims of Hurricane Katrina! Starhawk is always where it's at!! Like when she met with shamans in South America and they came out of deep meditation realizing that maybe we did not have the TIME to stop global warming - maybe we were doomed - and she reminded them that witches and shamans can operate outside the normal realm of time!!


Starhawk talked about stories. The conservatives like stories that confirm people's sense of entitlement - endless expansion, globalization, the continuing tide of wealth lifting all boats. No tide keeps rising forever! Letting corporations roam free can't work and fraud is revealed daily, from Madoff's Ponzi scheme to sending youth to prison for kickbacks. Conservatives continue to stand behind policies that haven't worked, such as those of the neocons/"Chicago school."

She talked about how women, earth, minorities, workers were all devalued as "dark matter" vs the more cerebral and light and male corporate spirit. Yet she reminded us that "dirty could be good - to "go deep," "get down." She advocated new metaphors in which "balance" and emphasis on cycles were emphasized rather than "dark forces" or the "dark side" or "light being." She also spoke of a shift from objects to relationships, starting with our relationship with our self and then our community (so permaculture, buying locally, knowing what's around you.)

"We are mother earth's transition team," she said. The personal is political. We need to be "harpies" against war, killing and use of military rather than diplomatic solutions.

The most powerful moment for me came when she talked about women my age who were introduced to feminism in the 1970s and there was kind of a "woman good men bad" mentality. She wondered whether this had to do with the fact that for women my age (and hers), our fathers were veterans of WW2. As such, they were traumatized but had no way to socially process much of this. They were expected to be heroes in a glorious and their feelings and experiences were denied and repressed. Grief, loss, and fear were cut off and they became somewhat forgetful of events and distanced emotionally. For years, I had felt like it was just my father, who had "shell shock" and electroshock treatments at the VA, lost the ability to teach and never spoke much about the war. To think that it was a whole generation, and to think in terms of fatherhood as juxtaposed with their war experiences but collectively, was revelation to me. Starhawk concluded that trauma can disconnect, and that a shift to a world based on relationships is what we need.

On the personal level, she talked about how in consciousness raising groups, we would get together and talk about something, like "rape" and to do so was unheard of at the time. It would be surprising to find out how common of an experience rape, molestation and other exploitation actually was, and also to her this talked about aloud. The talking proceeded in a circle, without interrupting the speaker, to allow the quietest voices to be heard. I remember this! Getting the issue out in the open was powerful.

Beyond personal relationships, Starhawk advocated for extending relationship to community - to push against downsizing, pressures for productivity, lack of time off - against corporate culture. She reminded us that our wage had been flat since the 1970s, so women went to work, then hours got longer, then people started working two and three jobs, and finally they started to borrow money. It used to be possible to buy a modest house for around the same price as renting. Now people want mini-mansions with lots of square footage.

If we downsize and support our community, we are doing the opposite of globalizing as we are not serving first an abstract profit for someone far off. If you believe in killing off any aspect of the self of the world that you don't like, from pesticides for plants to "wars" for terrorists, you also kill off the "beneficials." Less hate is bred when we feed what we want to grow rather than killing what we don't want. (This line of thinking can easily be extended to events in the middle east.) The planet has people, not "haters" - we need to know their reasons and to listen - this is diplomacy. We are not small tribes anymore who can shut out outsiders - we need to draw a larger circle. Starhawk also advocated for saying "no" as well as "yes" - where "no" is the opposing of the wrong and "yes" is using ritual to action.


She evoked Lakoff and "framing" and his consultations with the Obama campaign, and the power of "framing" that made all the difference. (Read Rockridge or Berkeley for more Lakoff.) She reminded us that to Lakoff, the contrast between Democrats and Republicans is that of a nurturing father vs. a strict father.

Republicans have grown up in a regimented manner, learning that it is their obligation to always obey an authority figure. The self is to be subordinated in favor of functioning in the conforming manner that will yield money. Republicans believe that any problem or failure a person has is the result of a violation of conformity and authoritarianism.

Republicans follow a strict father model and believe in punishment.


In President Obama's inaugural speech, he suggested that one way to contribute to the recovery of America is to "nurture a child." The word "nurture" was not accidental.

Sticks and Stones

Comments (0)

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.

- Albert Einstein

DSC03236

Photo by D. Grieser


This page is an archive of entries from February 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

January 2009 is the previous archive.

March 2009 is the next archive.

Keep DCP Talking

News Headlines

Powered by
Movable Type 4.01
Don't forget to check
the Open Thread blog
for all the daily chit-chat
and news items.

Costs

Cost of the War in Iraq

(JavaScript Error)