dcpblog.png

« Sticks and Stones | Main | Jefferson: Banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies »

Starhawk Evokes Obama As "Nurturing Father"


Poster2009conference

Starhawk (ecofeminist and justice worker) had contracted to speak at Women of Wisdom at Unity Church in Seattle, before the election actually happened, so she was ready to be grateful we could meet in an era of HOPE and CHANGE rather than in one where we are figuring out how to go on at all (in case a McCain/Palin victory had happened.) She talked about the "magical aspects" of the election and the emergence of a very different "energy." She compared it to sitting in a room full of toxic chemicals and all of a sudden, someone opens a window. After all, we had a financial crash just before the election, as though global warming and wars were not enough - we needed to be hit in the pocketbook. The universe made it clear to us that we needed change!

It was good to see someone I've been reading off and on for 20 years, and to hear of her permaculture and justice work, which she even manages to combine. For example, imagine coming up with composting toilets and the like for the G7 type protests over in Europe or wherever - then using the same technology to help victims of Hurricane Katrina! Starhawk is always where it's at!! Like when she met with shamans in South America and they came out of deep meditation realizing that maybe we did not have the TIME to stop global warming - maybe we were doomed - and she reminded them that witches and shamans can operate outside the normal realm of time!!


Starhawk talked about stories. The conservatives like stories that confirm people's sense of entitlement - endless expansion, globalization, the continuing tide of wealth lifting all boats. No tide keeps rising forever! Letting corporations roam free can't work and fraud is revealed daily, from Madoff's Ponzi scheme to sending youth to prison for kickbacks. Conservatives continue to stand behind policies that haven't worked, such as those of the neocons/"Chicago school."

She talked about how women, earth, minorities, workers were all devalued as "dark matter" vs the more cerebral and light and male corporate spirit. Yet she reminded us that "dirty could be good - to "go deep," "get down." She advocated new metaphors in which "balance" and emphasis on cycles were emphasized rather than "dark forces" or the "dark side" or "light being." She also spoke of a shift from objects to relationships, starting with our relationship with our self and then our community (so permaculture, buying locally, knowing what's around you.)

"We are mother earth's transition team," she said. The personal is political. We need to be "harpies" against war, killing and use of military rather than diplomatic solutions.

The most powerful moment for me came when she talked about women my age who were introduced to feminism in the 1970s and there was kind of a "woman good men bad" mentality. She wondered whether this had to do with the fact that for women my age (and hers), our fathers were veterans of WW2. As such, they were traumatized but had no way to socially process much of this. They were expected to be heroes in a glorious and their feelings and experiences were denied and repressed. Grief, loss, and fear were cut off and they became somewhat forgetful of events and distanced emotionally. For years, I had felt like it was just my father, who had "shell shock" and electroshock treatments at the VA, lost the ability to teach and never spoke much about the war. To think that it was a whole generation, and to think in terms of fatherhood as juxtaposed with their war experiences but collectively, was revelation to me. Starhawk concluded that trauma can disconnect, and that a shift to a world based on relationships is what we need.

On the personal level, she talked about how in consciousness raising groups, we would get together and talk about something, like "rape" and to do so was unheard of at the time. It would be surprising to find out how common of an experience rape, molestation and other exploitation actually was, and also to her this talked about aloud. The talking proceeded in a circle, without interrupting the speaker, to allow the quietest voices to be heard. I remember this! Getting the issue out in the open was powerful.

Beyond personal relationships, Starhawk advocated for extending relationship to community - to push against downsizing, pressures for productivity, lack of time off - against corporate culture. She reminded us that our wage had been flat since the 1970s, so women went to work, then hours got longer, then people started working two and three jobs, and finally they started to borrow money. It used to be possible to buy a modest house for around the same price as renting. Now people want mini-mansions with lots of square footage.

If we downsize and support our community, we are doing the opposite of globalizing as we are not serving first an abstract profit for someone far off. If you believe in killing off any aspect of the self of the world that you don't like, from pesticides for plants to "wars" for terrorists, you also kill off the "beneficials." Less hate is bred when we feed what we want to grow rather than killing what we don't want. (This line of thinking can easily be extended to events in the middle east.) The planet has people, not "haters" - we need to know their reasons and to listen - this is diplomacy. We are not small tribes anymore who can shut out outsiders - we need to draw a larger circle. Starhawk also advocated for saying "no" as well as "yes" - where "no" is the opposing of the wrong and "yes" is using ritual to action.


She evoked Lakoff and "framing" and his consultations with the Obama campaign, and the power of "framing" that made all the difference. (Read Rockridge or Berkeley for more Lakoff.) She reminded us that to Lakoff, the contrast between Democrats and Republicans is that of a nurturing father vs. a strict father.

Republicans have grown up in a regimented manner, learning that it is their obligation to always obey an authority figure. The self is to be subordinated in favor of functioning in the conforming manner that will yield money. Republicans believe that any problem or failure a person has is the result of a violation of conformity and authoritarianism.

Republicans follow a strict father model and believe in punishment.


In President Obama's inaugural speech, he suggested that one way to contribute to the recovery of America is to "nurture a child." The word "nurture" was not accidental.

3 Comments

woz said:

Oh, I wish I'd been there! Thanks DiAnne. This is a great account of ways to *be*. It gives us simple ways of relating. It encourages us to not ignore the negatives but to use the positives to counteract them; to recognise, accept and get past them.

And you are right....Starhawk is right......Obama is right.....We need to nurture ourselves, each other and our planet. Now is a good time to be alive. It will be hell for a long time and we'll be dragged down further and further. But we will get through it. I believe we will.

Sandy Author Profile Page said:

Hey Diane! Did you guys see the latest hit piece on Teresa, it just got under my last nerve.

http://www.lightupthedarkness.org/blog/?p=123

slugbug Author Profile Page said:

Thanks for sticking up for our dear Teresa!

DiAnne

Leave a comment


Not registered?   Click on 'Sign-in' above and then select 'Sign up' in the lower right corner. Don't forget to click on the link in the confirmation email that will be sent to your email address.

Don't forget to check
the Open Thread blog
for all the daily chit-chat
and news items.

Costs

Cost of the War in Iraq

(JavaScript Error)

Recent Comments